4.6 Article

Breakage behavior of gravel rock particles under impact force

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL PARTICLE MECHANICS
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 1075-1087

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-021-00393-2

Keywords

Impact; Breakage; Grain size distribution; Constitutive model; Rock particles; Fractal theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672066]
  2. Haitian Scholar fund of Dalian University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through SHPB tests, the breakage behavior of Nishan rock and Shoushan rock particles under different strain rates was investigated. It was found that their dynamic peak strengths increase with strain rate, and a dynamic increasing factor was used to describe this strain rate effect. Analysis of grain size distribution of fractured rock particles and the use of fractal theory revealed differences in dynamic strength variation with fractal dimension for the two types of rock particles.
To investigate the rock particle breakage behavior subject to impact load, a series of split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests were conducted on selected Nishan rock and Shoushan rock particles within gravel size range at different strain rates. Both rock particles exhibit a typical strain softening macrobehavior and their dynamic peak strengths increase with strain rate. A dynamic increasing factor (DIF) is used to describe this strain rate effect. Based on the SHPB test, a constitutive model is proposed for the two types of rock particles to describe their dynamic stress-strain behavior considering strain rate effect and damaging effect. Grain size distribution of fractured rock particles was analyzed, which reflected the fragmentation characteristics quantitatively. A fractal theory was used to describe the fragmentation characteristics and dynamic strength of both types of rock particles. Dynamic strength was found to vary differently with fractal dimension for Nishan rock and Shoushan rock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available