4.8 Article

Virus Reduction during Advanced Bardenpho and Conventional Wastewater Treatment Processes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 17, Pages 9524-9532

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01384

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pima County Wastewater: Member University of Arizona Water and Environmental Technology Center
  2. Water Sustain ability Program (WSP) Graduate Fellowship
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1361505] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated wastewater treatment for the removal of 11 different virus types (pepper mild mottle virus; Aichi virus; genogroup I, II, and IV noroviruses; enterovirus; sapovirus; group-A rotavirus; adenovirus; and JC and BK polyomaviruses) by two wastewater treatment facilities utilizing advanced Bardenpho technology and compared the results with conventional treatment processes. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing full-scale treatment processes that all received sewage influent from the same region. The incidence of viruses in wastewater was assessed with respect to absolute abundance, occurrence, and reduction in monthly samples collected throughout a 12 month period in southern Arizona. Samples were concentrated via an electronegative filter method and quantified using TaqMan-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Results suggest that Plant D, utilizing an advanced Bardenpho process as secondary treatment, effectively reduced pathogenic viruses better than facilities using conventional processes. However, the absence of cell-culture assays did not allow an accurate assessment of infective viruses. On the basis of these data, the Aichi virus is suggested as a conservative viral marker for adequate wastewater treatment, as it most often showed the best correlation coefficients to viral pathogens, was always detected at higher concentrations, and may overestimate the potential virus risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available