4.3 Article

Hidden Markov models identify major movement modes in accelerometer and magnetometer data from four albatross species

Journal

MOVEMENT ECOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00243-z

Keywords

Accelerometer; Albatross; Animal movement; Behavioral classification; Dynamic soaring; Hidden Markov models; Inertial measurement unit; Magnetometer

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER [79804]
  2. Minghua Zhang Early Career Faculty Innovation award
  3. NERC [bas0100035] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are essential tools in studying animal behavior, and hidden Markov models (HMMs) can effectively aid in identifying and classifying different behavioral patterns. Comparing accelerometer and magnetometer data, researchers found that models based solely on accelerometers were as accurate as those including magnetometer data, with the latter being particularly useful for studying certain behavior patterns.
Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) with high-resolution sensors such as accelerometers are now used extensively to study fine-scale behavior in a wide range of marine and terrestrial animals. Robust and practical methods are required for the computationally-demanding analysis of the resulting large datasets, particularly for automating classification routines that construct behavioral time series and time-activity budgets. Magnetometers are used increasingly to study behavior, but it is not clear how these sensors contribute to the accuracy of behavioral classification methods. Development of effective classification methodology is key to understanding energetic and life-history implications of foraging and other behaviors. Methods We deployed accelerometers and magnetometers on four species of free-ranging albatrosses and evaluated the ability of unsupervised hidden Markov models (HMMs) to identify three major modalities in their behavior: 'flapping flight', 'soaring flight', and 'on-water'. The relative contribution of each sensor to classification accuracy was measured by comparing HMM-inferred states with expert classifications identified from stereotypic patterns observed in sensor data. Results HMMs provided a flexible and easily interpretable means of classifying behavior from sensor data. Model accuracy was high overall (92%), but varied across behavioral states (87.6, 93.1 and 91.7% for 'flapping flight', 'soaring flight' and 'on-water', respectively). Models built on accelerometer data alone were as accurate as those that also included magnetometer data; however, the latter were useful for investigating slow and periodic behaviors such as dynamic soaring at a fine scale. Conclusions The use of IMUs in behavioral studies produces large data sets, necessitating the development of computationally-efficient methods to automate behavioral classification in order to synthesize and interpret underlying patterns. HMMs provide an accessible and robust framework for analyzing complex IMU datasets and comparing behavioral variation among taxa across habitats, time and space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available