4.5 Article

Genetic profiles of 103,106 individuals in the Taiwan Biobank provide insights into the health and history of Han Chinese

Journal

NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00178-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica [40-05-GMM]
  2. NIH [1R01 HG010689]
  3. NHGRI [3UM1HG008901-03S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Taiwan Biobank has collected genetic information from both high-coverage whole-genome sequencing and genome-wide SNP data of individuals with Han Chinese ancestry, revealing the full range of genetic variation in this population. The study found that some individuals carry mutations related to autosomal recessive diseases, cancer-predisposing genes, and variants affecting drug response, highlighting the potential for genetic testing to improve clinical care.
Personalized medical care focuses on prediction of disease risk and response to medications. To build the risk models, access to both large-scale genomic resources and human genetic studies is required. The Taiwan Biobank (TWB) has generated high-coverage, whole-genome sequencing data from 1492 individuals and genome-wide SNP data from 103,106 individuals of Han Chinese ancestry using custom SNP arrays. Principal components analysis of the genotyping data showed that the full range of Han Chinese genetic variation was found in the cohort. The arrays also include thousands of known functional variants, allowing for simultaneous ascertainment of Mendelian disease-causing mutations and variants that affect drug metabolism. We found that 21.2% of the population are mutation carriers of autosomal recessive diseases, 3.1% have mutations in cancer-predisposing genes, and 87.3% carry variants that affect drug response. We highlight how TWB data provide insight into both population history and disease burden, while showing how widespread genetic testing can be used to improve clinical care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available