4.6 Review

Synthetic TILs: Engineered Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes With Improved Therapeutic Potential

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.593848

Keywords

cancer immunotherapy; adoptive cell therapy; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; genetically engineered TILs; synthetic TILs

Categories

Funding

  1. CRIS Cancer Foundation [FCRIS-IFI-2018]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [SAF2017-89437-P, RTC-2017-5944-1, PRE2018-083445]
  3. Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) [19084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunotherapy has shown effectiveness in treating various types of cancers, particularly with significant impact on patients with malignant tumors like melanoma. However, success in solid tumors remains limited and future challenges need to be addressed.
Immunotherapy has emerged as an effective and life-changing approach for several types of cancers, both liquid and solid tumors. In combination with traditional treatments such as radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, immune checkpoints inhibitors have improved prognosis and overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma and many other cancers. Among adoptive cell therapies (ACT), while chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in some hematologic malignancies, such as B cell leukemias, their success in solid tumors remains scarce due to the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment. On the other hand, ACT using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is arguably the most effective treatment for metastatic melanoma patients, but even if their isolation has been achieved in epithelial tumors, their success beyond melanoma remains limited. Here, we review several aspects impacting TIL- and gene-modified synthetic TIL-based therapies and discuss future challenges that must be addressed with these approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available