4.7 Article

A genome-wide association study for gut metagenome in Chinese adults illuminates complex diseases

Journal

CELL DISCOVERY
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41421-020-00239-w

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the significant genetic influence on the gut microbiome, which plays a key role in human health and diseases. Analysis revealed abundant signals associated with the gut microbiome in metabolic, neurological, and immunological functions, with potential genetic attributes to enterotypes. Gender stratification led to differential associations, and a two-stage metagenome genome-wide association studies emphasized the importance of considering both microbiome and GWAS studies in understanding human health and diseases.
The gut microbiome has been established as a key environmental factor to health. Genetic influences on the gut microbiome have been reported, yet, doubts remain as to the significance of genetic associations. Here, we provide shotgun data for whole genome and whole metagenome from a Chinese cohort, identifying no <20% genetic contribution to the gut microbiota. Using common variants-, rare variants-, and copy number variations-based association analyses, we identified abundant signals associated with the gut microbiome especially in metabolic, neurological, and immunological functions. The controversial concept of enterotypes may have a genetic attribute, with the top two loci explaining 11% of the Prevotella-Bacteroides variances. Stratification according to gender led to the identification of differential associations in males and females. Our two-stage metagenome genome-wide association studies on a total of 1295 individuals unequivocally illustrates that neither microbiome nor GWAS studies could overlook one another in our quest for a better understanding of human health and diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available