4.8 Article

Environmental Chemicals in an Urban Population of Pregnant Women and Their Newborns from San Francisco

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 22, Pages 12464-12472

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03492

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. California Wellness Foundation
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5U38EH000481]
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science to Achieve Results Fellowship [91744701-01]
  4. U.S. EPA [RD83543301]
  5. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P01 ES022841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposures to environmental pollutants in utero may increase the risk of adverse health effects. We measured the concentrations of 59 potentially harmful chemicals in 77 maternal and 65 paired umbilical cord blood samples collected in San Francisco during 2010-2011, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hydroxylated PBDEs (OH-PBDEs), and perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in serum and metals in whole blood. Consistent with previous studies, we found evidence that concentrations of mercury (Hg) and lower-brominated PBDEs were often higher in umbilical cord blood or serum than in maternal samples (median cord:maternal ratio > 1), while for most PFCs and lead (Pb), concentrations in cord blood or serum were generally equal to or lower than their maternal pair (median cord:maternal ratio <= 1). In contrast to the conclusions of a recent review, we found evidence that several PCBs and OCPs were also often higher in cord than maternal serum (median cord:maternal ratio > 1) when concentrations are assessed on a lipid-adjusted basis. Our findings suggest that for many chemicals, fetuses may experience higher exposures than their mothers and highlight the need to characterize potential health risks and inform policies aimed at reducing sources of exposure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available