4.7 Article

Direct Comparative Analyses of 10X Genomics Chromium and Smart-seq2

Journal

GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 253-266

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.02.005

Keywords

Single-cell RNA sequencing; 10X; Smart-seq2; Bulk RNA-seq; Comparison

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31530036, 81573022, 31601063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically evaluated the features and limitations of two frequently used single-cell RNA sequencing platforms, 10X Genomics Chromium and Smart-seq2, by comparing their data generated from the same CD45(-) cell samples. Smart-seq2 detected more genes in a cell, especially low abundance and alternatively spliced transcripts, while 10X-based data showed more severe dropout problems but could detect rare cell types. The study provides insights into the characteristics of these technologies and their applications in single-cell transcriptomics.
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is generally used for profiling transcriptome of individual cells. The droplet-based 10X Genomics Chromium (10X) approach and the plate-based Smart-seq2 full-length method are two frequently used scRNA-seq platforms, yet there are only a few thorough and systematic comparisons of their advantages and limitations. Here, by directly comparing the scRNA-seq data generated by these two platforms from the same samples of CD45(-) cells, we systematically evaluated their features using a wide spectrum of analyses. Smart-seq2 detected more genes in a cell, especially low abundance transcripts as well as alternatively spliced transcripts, but captured higher proportion of mitochondrial genes. The composite of Smart-seq2 data also resembled bulk RNA-seq data more. For 10X-based data, we observed higher noise for mRNAs with low expression levels. Approximately 10%-30% of all detected transcripts by both platforms were from non-coding genes, with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) accounting for a higher proportion in 10X. 10X-based data displayed more severe dropout problem, especially for genes with lower expression levels. However, 10X-data can detect rare cell types given its ability to cover a large number of cells. In addition, each platform detected distinct groups of differentially expressed genes between cell clusters, indicating the different characteristics of these technologies. Our study promotes better understanding of these two platforms and offers the basis for an informed choice of these widely used technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available