4.8 Article

Goal-dependent tuning of muscle spindle receptors during movement preparation

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0401

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kempe Foundation
  2. local Foundation for Medical Research (Insamlingsstiftelsen)
  3. Medical Faculty of Umea University [2.1.6-1119-19]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2016-02237]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-02237] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During preparation for voluntary movements, goal-dependent modulation reduces human muscle afferent activity and also adjusts stretch reflex gains in shoulder and upper arm muscles. Central preparatory activity plays a role in tuning muscle stiffness through independent control of muscle spindle sensors based on task goals.
Voluntary movements are believed to undergo preparation before they are executed. Preparatory activity can benefit reaction time and the quality of planned movements, but the neural mechanisms at work during preparation are unclear. For example, there are no overt changes in muscle force during preparation. Here, using an instructed-delay manual task, we demonstrate a decrease in human muscle afferent activity (primary spindles) when preparing to reach targets in directions associated with stretch of the spindle-bearing muscle. This goal-dependent modulation of proprioceptors began early after target onset but was markedly stronger at the latter parts of the preparatory period. Moreover, whole-arm perturbations during reach preparation revealed a modulation of stretch reflex gains (shoulder and upper arm muscles) that reflected the observed changes in spindle activity. We suggest that one function of central preparatory activity is to tune muscle stiffness according to task goals via the independent control of muscle spindle sensors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available