4.7 Article

Life cycle carbon cost of buildings under carbon trading and carbon tax system in China

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102509

Keywords

Building; Life cycle; Carbon emission; Carbon cost; Carbon trading; Carbon tax

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2016YFC0701806]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Buildings account for 23% of the total CO2 emissions from global economic activities, with China contributing nearly 41%. Carbon accounting is essential for supporting an efficient low-carbon economic system. This article proposes a model for calculating the carbon cost of buildings and examines its relationship with the environmental damage cost of carbon emissions.
Buildings contribute 23 % of the total CO2 emissions produced by global economics activities, in which nearly 41 % are emitted by China. Carbon accounting is necessary to support an efficient low-carbon economic system. There is currently very little research on the carbon cost of buildings, especially in China. This article analyzes the carbon emissions generated during the life cycle of buildings, and transfers them to building environment cost and carbon cost. A life cycle building carbon cost accounting model was proposed under different carbon cost systems, including carbon trading system and carbon tax system. To verify the validity and reliability of the proposed model, the similarities and differences between carbon cost and carbon emission environmental damage cost determined by the Life-cycle Impact Assessment Method based on Endpoint Modeling (LIME) were compared. Carbon costs can link carbon reduction with economic benefits, and push the present policy-based mandatory reduction measures to market-based means, which is of great significance to sustainable development of the construction industry and China's future emission reduction targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available