4.6 Article

Nutrition as Metabolic Treatment for Anxiety

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598119

Keywords

anxiety; inflammation; microbiome; nutrition; mental illness

Categories

Funding

  1. Keasbey Memorial Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nutritional interventions can complement traditional treatments for anxiety disorders by addressing underlying metabolic pathologies through strategies such as avoiding artificial sweeteners, gluten, and incorporating omega-3 fatty acids and turmeric. Nutritional psychiatry is still in its early stages and further research is needed to support its broader implementation in clinical practice.
Despite the overwhelming prevalence of anxiety disorders in modern society, medications and psychotherapy often fail to achieve complete symptom resolution. A complementary approach to medicating symptoms is to address the underlying metabolic pathologies associated with mental illnesses and anxiety. This may be achieved through nutritional interventions. In this perspectives piece, we highlight the roles of the microbiome and inflammation as influencers of anxiety. We further discuss the evidence base for six specific nutritional interventions: avoiding artificial sweeteners and gluten, including omega-3 fatty acids and turmeric in the diet, supplementation with vitamin D, and ketogenic diets. We attempt to integrate insights from the nutrition science-literature in order to highlight some practices that practitioners may consider when treating individual patients. Notably, this piece is not meant to serve as a comprehensive review of the literature, but rather argue our perspective that nutritional interventions should be more widely considered among clinical psychiatrists. Nutritional psychiatry is in its infancy and more research is needed in this burgeoning low-risk and potentially high-yield field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available