4.5 Review

Therapeutic Options for Patients with TP53 Deficient Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Narrative Review

Journal

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 1459-1476

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S283903

Keywords

chronic lymphocytic leukemia; p53 protein; molecular aberrations; drug resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lublin [DS176, DS 175]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CLL, the most common type of leukemia in adults in western countries, shows heterogeneity in clinical course and response to treatment. TP53 aberrations are the most important factors of poor prognosis. Treatment of patients with TP53-deficiency requires drugs promoting cell death independently of TP53.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which is the most common type of leukemia in western countries in adults, is characterized by heterogeneity in clinical course, prognosis and response to the treatment. Although, in recent years a number of factors with probable prognostic value in CLL have been identified (eg NOTCH1, SF3B1 and BIRC-3 mutations, or evaluation of microRNA expression), TP53 aberrations are still the most important single factors of poor prognosis. It was found that approximately 30% of all TP53 defects are mutations lacking 17p13 deletion, whereas sole 17p13 deletion with the absence of TP53 mutation consists of 10% of all TP53 defects. The detection of del(17)(p13) and/or TP53 mutation is not a criterion itself for starting antileukemic therapy, but it is associated with an aggressive course of the disease and poor response to the standard chemoimmunotherapy. Treatment of patients with CLL harbouring TP53-deficiency requires drugs that promote cell death independently of TP53. Novel and smarter therapies revolutionize the treatment of del(17p) and/or aberrant TP53 CLL, but development of alternative therapeutic approaches still remains an issue of critical importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available