4.7 Article

Design Strategies for Enhanced Conductivity in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Journal

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 445-453

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1551964]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012445]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1551964] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of materials with permanent porosity, high surface area, and crystallinity, offering potential for a wide range of applications, particularly in conductive materials. The continued development of conductive MOFs has led to a growing library of materials with conductivity, while factors affecting conductivity in MOFs have become more apparent. Pathways to enhance conductivity across a variety of MOF structures are being explored in fundamental studies derived from proposed methods.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of materials which exhibit permanent porosity, high surface area, and crystallinity. As a highly tunable middle ground between heterogeneous and homogeneous species, MOFs have the potential to suit a wide variety of applications, many of which require conductive materials. The continued development of conductive MOFs has provided an ever-growing library of materials with both intrinsic and guest-promoted conductivity, and factors which limit or enhance conductivity in MOFs have become more apparent. In this Outlook, the factors which are believed to influence the future of MOF conductivity most heavily are highlighted along with proposed methods of further developing these fields. Fundamental studies derived from these methods may provide pathways to raise conductivity across a wide range of MOF structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available