4.8 Article

Design, Resource Management, and Evaluation of Fog Computing Systems: A Survey

Journal

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 2494-2516

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3022699

Keywords

Cloud computing; Edge computing; Resource management; Servers; Internet of Things; Computational modeling; Tools; Fog computing; fog design and dimensioning; fog infrastructure evaluation; fog resource management; Internet of Things (IoT); simulation; survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing demand for Internet-of-Things applications has led to an overreliance on cloud computing, resulting in network congestion and unreliable response delays. Fog computing, as an alternative to cloud, offers low-latency services by bringing processing and storage resources to the network edge.
A steady increase in Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications needing large-scale computation and long-term storage has lead to an overreliance on cloud computing. The resulting network congestion in the cloud, coupled with the distance of cloud data centers from IoT, contributes to unreliable end-to-end response delay. Fog computing has been introduced as an alternative to cloud, providing low-latency service by bringing processing and storage resources to the network edge. In this survey, we sequentially present the phases required in the implementation and realization of practical fog computing systems: 1) design and dimensioning of a fog infrastructure; 2) fog resource provisioning for IoT application use and IoT resource allocation to fog; 3) installation of fog frameworks for fog resource management; and 4) evaluation of fog infrastructure through simulation and emulation. Our focus is on determining the implementation aspects required to build a practical large-scale fog computing infrastructure to support the general IoT landscape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available