4.6 Article

A PUF-Based and Cloud-Assisted Lightweight Authentication for Multi-Hop Body Area Network

Journal

TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 36-47

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.26599/TST.2019.9010048

Keywords

Physical Unclonable Function (PUF); hardware security; Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61874042, 61602107]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province [2019GK2082]
  3. Peng Cheng Laboratory Project of Guangdong Province [PCL2018KP004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  5. Program for Lianning Innovative Research
  6. Hu-Xiang Youth Talent Program [2018RS3041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a lightweight PUF-based and cloud-assisted authentication mechanism for multi-hop body area networks, which enhances adaptability to human motion and data integrity while reducing storage overhead and resource loss.
Wireless sensor technology plays an important role in the military, medical, and commercial fields nowadays. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) is a special application of the wireless sensor network in human health monitoring, through which patients can know their physical condition in real time and respond to emergencies on time. Data reliability, guaranteed by the trust of nodes in WBAN, is a prerequisite for the effective treatment of patients. Therefore, authenticating the sensor nodes and the sink nodes in WBAN is necessary. This paper proposes a lightweight Physical Unclonable Function (PUF)-based and cloud-assisted authentication mechanism for multi-hop body area networks, which compared with the star single-hop network, can enhance the adaptability to human motion and the integrity of data transmission. Such authentication mechanism can significantly reduce the storage overhead and resource loss in the data transmission process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available