Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines
Matthew J. Page et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017
Tanja Rombey et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
Comparison of non-Cochrane systematic reviews and their published protocols: differences occurred frequently but were seldom explained
Nadja Koensgen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Differences between protocols for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews
Dawid Pieper et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Does body mass index truly affect mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients after coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft? A systematic review and network meta-analysis
W. -Q. Ma et al.
OBESITY REVIEWS (2018)
Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting
Matthew J. Page et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2018)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
Beverley J. Shea et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study
Andrea C. Tricco et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
Matthew J. Page et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2016)
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Larissa Shamseer et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Larissa Shamseer et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system
Philip F. Stahel et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Mohammad Hassan Murad et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
Synthesizing Evidence Shifting the Focus From Individual Studies to the Body of Evidence
M. Hassan Murad et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2013)
The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews
Alison Booth et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2012)
Measuring the Incidence, Causes, and Repercussions of Protocol Amendments
Kenneth A. Getz et al.
DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL (2011)
An international registry of systematic-review protocols
Alison Booth et al.
LANCET (2011)
Registering systematic reviews
Sharon Straus et al.
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2010)
Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research
David Chavalarias et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews
Jamie J. Kirkham et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2010)
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Alessandro Liberati et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2009)
Publishing Protocols of systematic reviews - Comparing what was done to what was planned
CA Silagy et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Share Paper
