4.7 Article

Redox biomarkers in dietary interventions and nutritional observation studies- From new insights to old problems

Journal

REDOX BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101922

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Biomarkers; Nutrition; Blood; Dietary intake; Intervention; Observational study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of recent studies investigating the associations of diet and dietary interventions with biomarkers of oxidative stress. The findings confirm the inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and oxidative stress markers. Studies on the effect of vitamin and mineral supplementation consistently reported changes in redox biomarkers.
Purpose: The purpose of this review is to give an overview on recently published articles investigating the associations of diet and dietary interventions with biomarkers of oxidative stress with special emphasis on different categories of redox biomarkers. Findings: Intervention and observational studies both in healthy participants and patients that investigated associations of dietary habits, foodstuffs or isolated nutrients with biomarkers of oxidative stress were included in this review. Recently published observation studies confirm the inverse association between fruit and vegetable intake and oxidative stress markers. Studies investigating the effect of vitamin D and vitamin E, magnesium, zinc, chromium, selenium, probiotic supplementation and several phytochemicals reported consistent changes in redox biomarkers. Of 88 articles included in this review, only seven studies measured biomarkers from the three categories: oxidative damage, endogenous antioxidants, and exogenous antioxidants. Many studies rely on controversial assays for total antioxidant capacity, thus there is potential in many studies to improve biomarker repertoire to cover all three categories of biomarkers and to turn away from such assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available