4.7 Article

Information transfer as a framework for optimized phase imaging

Journal

OPTICA
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 493-501

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.412129

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0019174-00]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [5723]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of dedicated phase contrast optics for imaging non-absorbing samples is discussed in the article. The efficiency of various phase imaging schemes is evaluated using Fisher information, and an information transfer function is calculated. The study shows that generalized Zernike phase contrast with prior knowledge and random sensing measurements are effective methods.
In order to efficiently image a non-absorbing sample (a phase object), dedicated phase contrast optics are required. Typically, these optics are designed with the assumption that the sample is weakly scattering, implying a linear relation between a sample's phase and its transmission function. In the strongly scattering, nonlinear case, the standard optics are ineffective, and the transfer functions used to characterize them are uninformative. We use the Fisher information (FI) to assess the efficiency of various phase imaging schemes and to calculate an information transfer function (ITF). We show that a generalized version of Zernike phase contrast is efficient given sufficient prior knowledge of the sample. We show that with no prior knowledge, a random sensing measurement yields a significant fraction of the available information. Finally, we introduce a generalized approach to common path interferometry that can be optimized to prioritize sensitivity to particular sample features. Each of these measurements can be performed using Fourier lenses and phase masks. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available