4.7 Article

Improved sub-seasonal meteorological forecast skill using weighted multi-model ensemble simulations

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094007

Keywords

sub-seasonal forecasting; NMME phase 2; extreme events; weighted ensemble mean; global

Funding

  1. NWO Rubicon Fellowship [825.15.003]
  2. NOAA Climate Program Office [NA15OAR4310075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sub-seasonal to seasonal weather and hydrological forecasts have the potential to provide vital information for a variety of water-related decision makers. Here, we investigate the skill of four sub-seasonal forecast models from phase-2 of the North American Multi-Model Ensemble using reforecasts for the period 1982-2012. Two weighted multi-model ensemble means from the models have been developed for predictions of both sub-seasonal precipitation and temperature. By combining models through optimal weights, the multi-model forecast skill is significantly improved compared to a 'standard' equally weighted multi-model forecast mean. We show that optimal model weights are robust and the forecast skill is maintained for increased length of time and regions with a low initial forecast skill show significant skill after optimal weighting of the individual model forecast. The sub-seasonal model forecasts models show high skill over the tropics, approximating their skill at monthly resolution. Using the weighted approach, a significant increase is found in the forecast skill for dry, wet, cold and warm extreme events. The weighted mean approach brings significant advances to sub-seasonal forecasting due to its reduced uncertainty in the forecasts with a gain in forecast skill. This significantly improves their value for end-user applications and our ability to use them to prepare for upcoming extreme conditions, like floods and droughts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available