4.5 Article

A bi-directional approach to comparing the modular structure of networks

Journal

EPJ DATA SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00269-8

Keywords

Networks; Modular structure; Network comparison

Funding

  1. Skye Foundation Trust
  2. Oppenheimer Memorial Trust
  3. Turing-HSBC-ONS Economic Data Science Award 'Network modelling of the UK's urban skill base'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new method to compare the modular structure of a pair of node-aligned networks by assessing the fit of each node partition with respect to the other network's connectivity structure. The method is adaptable to various community detection algorithms, takes into account network structure, and can identify differences in networks with similar partitions but varying community structures.
Here we propose a new method to compare the modular structure of a pair of node-aligned networks. The majority of current methods, such as normalized mutual information, compare two node partitions derived from a community detection algorithm yet ignore the respective underlying network topologies. Addressing this gap, our method deploys a community detection quality function to assess the fit of each node partition with respect to the other network's connectivity structure. Specifically, for two networks A and B, we project the node partition of B onto the connectivity structure of A. By evaluating the fit of B's partition relative to A's own partition on network A (using a standard quality function), we quantify how well network A describes the modular structure of B. Repeating this in the other direction, we obtain a two-dimensional distance measure, the bi-directional (BiDir) distance. The advantages of our methodology are three-fold. First, it is adaptable to a wide class of community detection algorithms that seek to optimize an objective function. Second, it takes into account the network structure, specifically the strength of the connections within and between communities, and can thus capture differences between networks with similar partitions but where one of them might have a more defined or robust community structure. Third, it can also identify cases in which dissimilar optimal partitions hide the fact that the underlying community structure of both networks is relatively similar. We illustrate our method for a variety of community detection algorithms, including multi-resolution approaches, and a range of both simulated and real world networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available