4.6 Article

A Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Adoption of Additive Manufacturing in the Product Design Process

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11031210

Keywords

additive manufacturing; design for additive manufacturing; product design; multi criteria decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the process of design, it is necessary to consider information from multiple fields in order to thoroughly evaluate material properties, compatibility, and reshape design for optimal design results. This paper proposes a structured and algorithmic framework to support designers in evaluating and guiding the adoption of additive manufacturing.
Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies have expanded the possibility of producing unconventional geometries, also increasing the freedom of design. However, in the designer's everyday work, the decision regarding the adoption of AM for the production of a component is not straightforward. In fact, it is necessary to process much information regarding multiple fields to exploit the maximum potential of additive production. For example, there is a need to evaluate the properties of the printable materials, their compatibility with the specific application, redesign shapes accordingly to AM limits, and conceive unique and complex products. Additionally, procurement and logistics evaluations, as well as overall costs possibly extending to the entire life cycle, are necessary to come to a decision for a new and radical solution. In this context, this paper investigates the complex set of information involved in this process. Indeed, it proposes a framework to support and guide a designer by means of a structured and algorithmic procedure to evaluate the opportunity for the adoption of AM and come to an optimal design. A case study related to an ultralight aircraft part is reported to demonstrate the proposed decision process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available