4.6 Article

gbt-HIPS: Explaining the Classifications of Gradient Boosted Tree Ensembles

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11062511

Keywords

explainable artificial intelligence; human-understandable AI systems; gradient boosting; black box problem; machine learning interpretability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

gbt-HIPS is a novel heuristic method for explaining gradient boosted tree classification models by extracting a single classification rule from the ensemble of decision trees that make up the GBT model. It offers the best trade-off between coverage and precision, while also being demonstrably guarded against under- and over-fitting. Additionally, it provides counterfactual detail in accordance with widely accepted recommendations for what makes a good explanation.
This research presents Gradient Boosted Tree High Importance Path Snippets (gbt-HIPS), a novel, heuristic method for explaining gradient boosted tree (GBT) classification models by extracting a single classification rule (CR) from the ensemble of decision trees that make up the GBT model. This CR contains the most statistically important boundary values of the input space as antecedent terms. The CR represents a hyper-rectangle of the input space inside which the GBT model is, very reliably, classifying all instances with the same class label as the explanandum instance. In a benchmark test using nine data sets and five competing state-of-the-art methods, gbt-HIPS offered the best trade-off between coverage (0.16-0.75) and precision (0.85-0.98). Unlike competing methods, gbt-HIPS is also demonstrably guarded against under- and over-fitting. A further distinguishing feature of our method is that, unlike much prior work, our explanations also provide counterfactual detail in accordance with widely accepted recommendations for what makes a good explanation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available