4.6 Article

Revealing Tissue-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Host Responses using Human Stem Cell-Derived Lung and Cerebral Organoids

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 437-445

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.02.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Career Award for Medical Scientists from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund USA
  2. National Institutes of Health USA [CA177322, DA039562, DA049524, AI125103, K08 AI130381]
  3. John and Mary Tu Foundation USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers generated iPSC-derived lung and brain organoids, finding that lung organoids are highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection, while brain organoids are less susceptible. These findings will aid in understanding the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and drug discovery.
COVID-19 is a transmissible respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, and has become a global health emergency. There is an urgent need for robust and practical in vitro model systems to investigate viral pathogenesis. Here, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived lung organoids (LORGs), cerebral organoids (CORGs), neural progenitor cells (NPCs), neurons, and astrocytes. LORGs containing epithelial cells, alveolar types 1 and 2, highly express ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and are permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces interferons, cytokines, and chemokines and activates critical inflammasome pathway genes. Spike protein inhibitor, EK1 peptide, and TMPRSS2 inhibitors (camostat/nafamostat) block viral entry in LORGs. Conversely, CORGs, NPCs, astrocytes, and neurons express low levels of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and correspondingly are not highly permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection in neuronal cells activates TLR3/7, OAS2, complement system, and apoptotic genes. These findings will aid in understanding COVID-19 pathogenesis and facilitate drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available