4.6 Article

Gene Therapy of Dominant CRX-Leber Congenital Amaurosis using Patient Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Organoids

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 252-263

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.12.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Programs of the National Eye Institute [ZIAEY000450, ZIAEY000546]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the CRX gene lead to distinct retinopathy phenotypes and early-onset vision impairment. Using iPSCs from patients with CRX mutations, researchers established in vitro models of CRX-LCA and found that AAV-mediated CRX gene augmentation therapy partially restored defective photoreceptor maturation and opsins expression. This study provides proof-of-concept for developing gene therapy for dominant CRX-LCA and other CRX retinopathies.
Mutations in the photoreceptor transcription factor gene cone-rod homeobox (CRX) lead to distinct retinopathy phenotypes, including early-onset vision impairment in dominant Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). Using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from a patient with CRX-I138fs48 mutation, we established an in vitro model of CRX-LCA in retinal organoids that showed defective photoreceptor maturation by histology and gene profiling, with diminished expression of visual opsins. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated CRX gene augmentation therapy partially restored photoreceptor phenotype and expression of phototransduction-related genes as determined by single-cell RNA-sequencing. Retinal organoids derived from iPSCs of a second dominant CRX-LCA patient carrying K88N mutation revealed the loss of opsin expression as a common phenotype, which was alleviated by AAV-mediated augmentation of CRX. Our studies provide a proof-of-concept for developing gene therapy of dominant CRX-LCA and other CRX retinopathies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available