4.7 Article

Room-Temperature Hydrogen-Sensing Capabilities of Pt-SnO2 and Pt-ZnO Composite Nanoceramics Occur via Two Different Mechanisms

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11020504

Keywords

Pt-SnO2; Pt-ZnO; composite nanoceramics; hydrogen; mechanism

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20190808152803567]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFB2008800]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U2067207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals two different room-temperature hydrogen-sensing mechanisms among MOXs, with Pt-SnO2 and Pt-ZnO composite nanoceramics showing contrasting and stable responses to hydrogen at room temperature due to different chemical reaction mechanisms.
Impressive room-temperature gas-sensing capabilities have been reported for nanomaterials of many metal oxides, including SnO2, ZnO, TiO2, WO3, and Fe2O3, while little attention has been paid to the intrinsic difference among them. Pt-SnO2 and Pt-ZnO composite nanoceramics have been prepared through convenient pressing and sintering. The former shows strong and stable responses to hydrogen in 20% O-2-N-2 (synthetic air) at room temperature, while the responses to hydrogen in N-2 cannot be stabilized in limited times; the latter shows strong and stable responses to hydrogen in N-2, while the responses to hydrogen in synthetic air are greatly depressed. Further analyses reveal that for Pt-ZnO, the responses result from the reaction between hydrogen and oxygen chemisorbed on ZnO; while for Pt-SnO2, the responses result from two reactions of hydrogen, one is that with oxygen chemisorbed on SnO2 and the other is hydrogen chemisorption on SnO2. These results reveal two different room-temperature hydrogen-sensing mechanisms among MOXs, which results in highly contrasting room-temperature hydrogen-sensing capabilities attractive for sensing hydrogen in oxygen-contained and oxygen-free environments, separately.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available