4.3 Review

A candidate biomarker of glial fibrillary acidic protein in CSF and blood in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102870

Keywords

Glial fibrillary acidic protein; Multiple sclerosis; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Funding

  1. Special Fund Project for Doctoral Training Program of Lanzhou University Second Hospital [YJS-BD-19]
  2. Lanzhou Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project [2018-RC-74]
  3. Province International Science and Technology Cooperation Base for Precise Treatment of Neurological Diseases

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that levels of CSF-GFAP are associated with MS and its different subtypes, reflecting varying degrees of astrocyte damage in different MS subtypes. Progressive MS is more closely linked to increased cerebrospinal fluid GFAP levels than relapsing-remitting MS, suggesting GFAP may be a useful marker of disease progression. Additionally, blood GFAP levels in MS patients are higher than those in the control group, warranting further verification with a larger sample size in the future.
Objective: : Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a monomeric intermediate filament protein. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed regarding a candidate biomarker for astrocytic damage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood GFAP levels in differentiating multiple sclerosis and its subtypes. Methods: : Relevant studies published prior to October 2020 were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov databases using the following keywords: 'Multiple sclerosis' or 'MS' and 'Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein' or 'GFAP'. Two authors independently selected the articles and extracted the data. Of the 31 full articles screened, 11 were included in the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis. Differences in the mean CSF and blood GFAP levels were used as the main efficacy measures, and the meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3 software. Results: : Eleven clinical trials comprising 960 patients were selected. CSF GFAP levels were higher in 503 MS patients than in 252 (healthy and disease) controls, with a moderate effect size of 0.72 (p < 0.00001). Mean CSF GFAP levels were significantly higher in 325 MS patients with relapsing disease than in 140 MS patients with progressive disease (SMD=-0.47; 95% CI=-0.80 to -0.15; P = 0.005). CSF GFAP levels in 161 MS patients in relapse (irrespective of MS subtype) were significantly higher than those in 180 MS patients in remission (MD=103.83; 95% CI=68.09 to139.57; P<0.001). The performances of GFAP in blood for differentiating patients with MS from controls were also significant. Blood GFAP was higher in 245 MS patients than in 53 (healthy and disease) controls, with a moderate effect size of 37.25 (p < 0.00001). Conclusion: : The level of CSF-GFAP is correlated with MS and its different subtypes, reflecting the different degrees of damage to astrocytes in different subtypes of MS. In addition, progressive MS is more closely related to the increase in cerebrospinal fluid GFAP level than relapsing-remitting MS, and GFAP may be a useful marker of disease progression. Moreover, the GFAP level in the blood of MS patients is higher than that in the control group, and the sample size needs to be further expanded for verification in the future..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available