4.4 Article

Embryo Injections for CRISPR-Mediated Mutagenesis in the Ant Harpegnathos saltator

Journal

JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
Volume -, Issue 168, Pages -

Publisher

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/61930

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation I/UCRC
  2. Center for Arthropod Management Technologies [IIP-1821914]
  3. United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, Vaadia-BARD Postdoctoral Fellowship [FI-595-19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores how genes regulate social traits in eusocial insects by developing mutant ants using CRISPR technology. The protocol involves microinjection of Cas9 proteins and sgRNAs into embryos during their syncytial stage, and can be applied to a wider range of insects for studying caste-specific physiology and social behavior.
The unique traits of eusocial insects, such as social behavior and reproductive division of labor, are controlled by their genetic system. To address how genes regulate social traits, we have developed mutant ants via delivery of CRISPR complex into young embryos during their syncytial stage. Here, we provide a protocol of CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis in Harpegnathos saltator, a ponerine ant species that displays striking phenotypic plasticity. H. saltator ants are readily reared in a laboratory setting. Embryos are collected for microinjection with Cas9 proteins and in vitro synthesized small guide RNAs (sgRNAs) using home-made quartz needles. Post-injection embryos are reared outside the colony. Following emergence of the first larva, all embryos and larvae are transported to a nest box with a few nursing workers for further development. This protocol is suitable for inducing mutagenesis for analysis of caste-specific physiology and social behavior in ants, but may also be applied to a broader spectrum of hymenopterans and other insects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available