4.4 Article

Mediating effects of rumination and bedtime procrastination on the relationship between Internet addiction and poor sleep quality

Journal

JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 1002-1010

Publisher

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/2006.2020.00104

Keywords

Internet addiction; poor sleep quality; rumination; bedtime procrastination

Categories

Funding

  1. Hubei Province Education Science Planning Fund [2019GA011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Numerous studies have shown that people who have Internet addiction (IA) are more likely to experience poor sleep quality than people who do not. However, few studies have explored mechanisms underlying the relation between IA and poor sleep quality. As a first attempt to address this knowledge gap, a cross-sectional design was applied, and structural equation modeling was used to explore the direct relationship between IA and poor sleep quality, as well as the potential mediating roles of rumination and bedtime procrastination. Methods: A convenience sample, consisting of 1,104 Chinese University students (696 females or 63%), completed an online survey that included the following measures: Young's 8-item Internet Addiction Diagnosis Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Ruminative Responses Scale, and the Bedtime Procrastination Scale. Results: While the direct path between IA and poor sleep quality was not found to be significant, rumination and bedtime procrastination were each shown to separately mediate the predictive effect of IA on poor sleep quality. However, the greatest level of support was found for the sequential mediating effects of rumination and bedtime procrastination between IA and poor sleep quality. Conclusion: While rumination and bedtime procrastination were both shown to be important independent mediators for the relation between IA and poor sleep quality, their combined effect was as great as either alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available