4.7 Review

Considerations on D-mannose Mechanism of Action and Consequent Classification of Marketed Healthcare Products

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.636377

Keywords

D-mannose; urinary tract infection; FimH adhesin; medical device; product administrative classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common disorders that affect adult women, often caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Recurrent UTIs are frequently treated with non-prescribed antibiotics by patients, leading to increased antibiotic resistance issues. D-mannose has been proposed as an alternative approach for managing UTIs due to its ability to inhibit bacterial adhesion to the urothelium.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are very common disorders that affect adult women. Indeed, 50% of all women suffer from UTIs at least one time in their lifetime; 20-40% of them experience recurrent episodes. The majority of UTIs seems to be due to uropathogenic Escherichia coli that invades urothelial cells and forms quiescent bacterial reservoirs. Recurrences of UTIs are often treated with non-prescribed antibiotics by the patients, with increased issues connected to antibiotics resistance. D-mannose, a monosaccharide that is absorbed but not metabolized by the human body, has been proposed as an alternative approach for managing UTIs since it can inhibit the bacterial adhesion to the urothelium. This manuscript discusses the mechanisms through which D-mannose acts to highlight the regulatory aspects relevant for determining the administrative category of healthcare products placed on the market. The existing literature permits to conclude that the anti-adhesive effect of D-mannose cannot be considered as a pharmacological effect and, therefore, D-mannose-based products should be classified as medical devices composed of substances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available