4.7 Review

Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.635823

Keywords

juvenile idiopathic arthritis; serological biomarkers; imaging biomarkers; cellular biomarkers; biologics

Funding

  1. Action Medical grant [1063]
  2. Center of Excellence (Center for Adolescent Rheumatology vs. Arthritis) grant [21593]
  3. NIHR Biomedical Research Center at University College London Hospital [BRC/III 525, BRC/III 773]
  4. MRC [MR/R013926/1]
  5. GOSH Children's Charity
  6. NIHR Biomedical Research Center at GOSH
  7. British Society of Rheumatology [4190033]
  8. NIHR Biomedical Research Center at University College London Hospital
  9. [20164]
  10. [20762]
  11. MRC [MR/R013926/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the role of biomarkers in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA, proposing new strategies for biomarker use. Various types of biomarkers were reviewed, identifying candidates with potential clinical utility and highlighting the need for new biomarker discovery and improved clinical applications.
Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood, characterized by various clinical phenotypes associated with variable prognosis. Significant progress has been achieved with the use of biologic treatments, which specifically block pro-inflammatory molecules involved in the disease pathogenesis. The most commonly used biologics in JIA are monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins targeting interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Several biomarkers have been investigated in JIA. Aims: To assess the level of evidence available regarding the role of biomarkers in JIA related to guiding clinical and therapeutic decisions, providing disease prognostic information, facilitating disease activity monitoring and assessing biologic treatment response in JIA, as well as propose new strategies for biologic therapy-related biomarker use in JIA. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant literature using predefined key words corresponding to several categories of biomarkers to assess their role in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA. Results: We reviewed serological, cellular, genetic, transcriptomic and imaging biomarkers, to identify candidates that are both well-established and widely used, as well as newly investigated in JIA on biologic therapy. We evaluated their role in management of JIA as well as identified the unmet needs for new biomarker discovery and better clinical applications. Conclusion: Although there are no ideal biomarkers in JIA, we identified serological biomarkers with potential clinical utility. We propose strategies of combining biomarkers of response to biologics in JIA, as well as routine implementation of clinically acceptable imaging biomarkers for improved disease assessment performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available