4.7 Article

Higher ETV5 Expression Associates With Poor 5-Florouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy Response in Colon Cancer

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.620811

Keywords

ETV5; ETV4; 5-fluorouracil; colon cancer; PEA3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals a negative correlation between ETV4 expression and DNA methylation, and a positive correlation between ETV5 expression and DNA methylation in colon cancer tissue. Additionally, higher ETV5 expression is associated with shorter relapse-free survival in colon cancer patients receiving adjCTX treatment.
Discovery of markers predictive for 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCTX) response in patients with locally advanced stage II and III colon cancer (CC) is necessary for precise identification of potential therapy responders. PEA3 subfamily of ETS transcription factors (ETV1, ETV4, and ETV5) are upregulated in multiple cancers including colon cancers. However, the underlying epigenetic mechanism regulating their overexpression as well as their role in predicting therapy response in colon cancer are largely unexplored. In this study, using gene expression and methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, we showed that promoter DNA methylation negatively correlates with ETV4 expression (rho = -0.17, p = 5.6 x 10(-3)) and positively correlates with ETV5 expression (rho = 0.22, p = 1.43 x 10(-4)) in colon cancer tissue. Further, our analysis in 1,482 colon cancer patients from five different cohorts revealed that higher ETV5 expression associates with shorter relapse-free survival (RFS) of adjCTX treated colon cancer patients (Hazard ratio = 2.09-5.43, p = 0.004-0.01). The present study suggests ETV5 expression as a strong predictive biomarker for 5-FU-based adjCTX response in stage II/III CC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available