4.6 Review

Perspectives and controversies regarding the use of natural products for the treatment of lung cancer

Journal

CANCER MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 2396-2422

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3660

Keywords

apoptosis; chemotherapy; lung cancer; nanoparticles; natural products

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women. Over the years, natural compounds extracted from natural products have been found to be potentially useful in treating lung cancer, but there has not been a corresponding increase in the number of drugs used in clinical settings.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality both in men and women and accounts for 18.4% of all cancer-related deaths. Although advanced therapy methods have been developed, the prognosis of lung cancer patients remains extremely poor. Over the past few decades, clinicians and researchers have found that chemical compounds extracted from natural products may be useful for treating lung cancer. Drug formulations derived from natural compounds, such as paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and camptothecin, have been successfully used as chemotherapeutics for lung cancer. In recent years, hundreds of new natural compounds that can be used to treat lung cancer have been found through basic and sub-clinical research. However, there has not been a corresponding increase in the number of drugs that have been used in a clinical setting. The probable reasons may include low solubility, limited absorption, unfavorable metabolism, and severe side effects. In this review, we present a summary of the natural compounds that have been proven to be effective for the treatment of lung cancer, as well as an understanding of the mechanisms underlying their pharmacological effects. We have also highlighted current controversies and have attempted to provide solutions for the clinical translation of these compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available