4.5 Article

New genetic prognostic biomarkers in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

Journal

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2061

Keywords

biomarkers; central nervous system neoplasms; gene expression; lymphoma; survival analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overexpression of MYC and MGMT were found to be prognostic markers associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in PCNSL-DLBCL patients. Age > 60 years and moderate/high IELSG score were also linked to worse prognosis.
Background PCNSL is a rare extranodal NHL with poor prognosis. Tumorigenesis has been associated with hyperactivation of BCR downstream and NFkB pathways. We studied the prognosis of the relative expression profile of target genes of NFkB pathway (MYC, BCL2), the essential transcriptional regulator in hematopoiesis LMO2, the checkpoint regulation pathway MGMT, the transcription factor POU2F1, the immune checkpoint gene PDCD1, and the proto-oncogene and transcriptional repressor gene BCL6 and its proteins in PCNSL. Methods This study is a retrospective cohort study; 35 immunocompetent PCNSL-DLBCL patients had their gene expression (RT-qPCR) normalized to internal control gene GUSB. Results Median patient age was 62 years, median OS was 42.6 months (95% CI: 26.6-58.6), PFS was 41 months (95% CI: 19.7-62.4), and DFS was 59.2 months (95% CI 31.9-86.6). A moderate correlation was found between the gene/protein expressions of MYC (kappa = 0.596, p = .022) and of BCL2 (kappa = 0.426, p = .042). Relative gene expression of MYC >= 0.201 (HR 6.117; p = .003) was associated with worse 5-year OS. Relative gene expression of MYC >= 0.201 (HR 3.96; p = .016) and MGMT >= 0.335 (HR 3.749; p = .056) was associated with worse PFS. Age > 60 years and IELSG score moderate/high were also associated with worse prognosis. Conclusions Overexpression of MYC and overexpression of MGMT were prognostic markers associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in PCNSL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available