4.5 Article

Automatic Retrieval of Shoeprints Using Modified Multi-Block Local Binary Pattern

Journal

SYMMETRY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13020296

Keywords

automatic image retrieval; feature extraction; local binary pattern (LBP); MMB-LBP; shoeprint; similarity measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel automatic method called Modified Multi-Block Local Binary Pattern (MMB-LBP) was proposed to maintain the local features of a shoeprint image and place a pattern in a block. The proposed method outperforms other methods in terms of retrieving complete and incomplete shoeprints, and shows significant resistance to distortions like rotation, salt and pepper noise, and Gaussian white noise.
A shoeprint is a valuable clue found at a crime scene and plays a significant role in forensic investigations. In this paper, in order to maintain the local features of a shoeprint image and place a pattern in a block, a novel automatic method was proposed, referred to as Modified Multi-Block Local Binary Pattern (MMB-LBP). In this method, shoeprint images are divided into blocks according to two different models. The histograms of all blocks of the first and second models are separately measured and stored in the first and second feature matrices, respectively. The performance evaluations of the proposed method were carried out by comparing with state-of-the-art methods. The evaluation criteria are the successful retrieval rates obtained using the best match score at rank one and cumulative match score for the first five matches. The comparison results indicated that the proposed method performs better than other methods, in terms of retrieval of complete and incomplete shoeprints. That is, the proposed method was able to retrieve 97.63% of complete shoeprints, 96.5% of incomplete toe shoeprints, and 91.18% of incomplete heel shoeprints. Moreover, the experiments showed that the proposed method is significantly resistant to the rotation, salt and pepper noise, and Gaussian white noise distortions in comparison with the other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available