4.6 Article

Evaluation of Provincial Carbon Neutrality Capacity of China Based on Combined Weight and Improved TOPSIS Model

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13052777

Keywords

carbon neutrality; capability assessment; cloud model; improved TOPSIS model

Funding

  1. 2018 Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education, China [18JZD032]
  2. 111 Project, Ministry of Science and Technology of People's Republic of China [B18021]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [71804045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It will be a huge challenge for China to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. A comprehensive evaluation of the carbon neutrality capacity of China's provinces reveals that factors such as renewable energy utilization, ecological environmental quality, and low-carbon technology play important roles. Various suggestions are proposed to accelerate the pace of carbon neutrality.
It will be a huge challenge for China to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. At present, China needs to understand its own carbon neutrality status and then scientifically plan a path to achieve carbon neutrality. In order to evaluate the carbon neutrality capacity of China's provinces, this paper firstly constructs an evaluation indicator system, which includes 20 indicators at six levels. Then, a combination of subjective and objective weighting methods, as well as an improved technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) model, are used to calculate evaluation results. On this basis, the reasons for their different carbon neutrality capacities are analyzed. The results show that the use of renewable energy, maintaining ecological environmental quality, and low-carbon technology are important factors affecting China's carbon neutrality capacity, and according to the evaluation results, China's provinces are divided into three categories. Finally, corresponding suggestions for speeding up the pace of carbon neutrality are put forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available