4.7 Article

Fugitive methane emissions from leak-prone natural gas distribution infrastructure in urban environments

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages 710-716

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.094

Keywords

Greenhouse gas; Methane; Natural gas; Distribution pipelines

Funding

  1. Barr Foundation
  2. Conservation Law Foundation
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [F13F31263]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB 0948857]
  5. EPA [F13F31263, 673595] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fugitive emissions from natural gas systems are the largest anthropogenic source of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4) in the U.S. and contribute to the risk of explosions in urban environments. Here, we report on a survey of CH4 emissions from 100 natural gas leaks in cast iron distribution mains in Metro Boston, MA. Direct measures of CH4 flux from individual leaks ranged from 4.0 - 2.3 x 10(4) g CH4 center dot day(-1). The distribution of leak size is positively skewed, with 7% of leaks contributing 50% of total CH4 emissions measured. We identify parallels in the skewed distribution of leak size found in downstream systems with midstream and upstream stages of the gas process chain. Fixing 'superemitter' leaks will disproportionately stem greenhouse gas emissions. Fifteen percent of leaks surveyed qualified as potentially explosive (Grade 1), and we found no difference in CH4 flux between Grade 1 leaks and all remaining leaks surveyed (p = 0.24). All leaks must be addressed, as even small leaks cannot be disregarded as 'safely leaking.' Key methodological impediments to quantifying and addressing the impacts of leaking natural gas distribution infrastructure involve inconsistencies in the manner in which gas leaks are defined, detected, and classified. To address this need, we propose a two-part leak classification system that reflects both the safety and climatic impacts of natural gas leaks. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available