4.6 Article

Circular Bioeconomy Research for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Innovations, Gaps, and Actions

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13041926

Keywords

circular bioeconomy; sustainability; agriculture; outcome tracking; gap analysis; sub-Saharan Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluates the contributions of IITA's circular bioeconomy innovations in addressing economic, social, and environmental outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa, identifying areas for improvement through outcome tracking and gap analysis methods. The results show that IITA's interventions led to technological innovations and positive outcomes in crop productivity, food security, resource use efficiency, job creation, and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. This evidence highlights the importance of integrating circular bioeconomy approaches in research and development work to achieve significant impacts.
The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) has applied the concept of 'circular bioeconomy' to design solutions to address the degradation of natural resources, nutrient-depleted farming systems, hunger, and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Over the past decade, IITA has implemented ten circular bioeconomy focused research for development (R4D) interventions in several countries in the region. This article aims to assess the contributions of IITA's circular bioeconomy focused innovations towards economic, social, and environmental outcomes using the outcome tracking approach, and identify areas for strengthening existing circular bioeconomy R4D interventions using the gap analysis method. Data used for the study came from secondary sources available in the public domain. Results indicate that IITA's circular bioeconomy interventions led to ten technological innovations (bio-products) that translated into five economic, social, and environmental outcomes, including crop productivity, food security, resource use efficiency, job creation, and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Our gap analysis identified eight gaps leading to a portfolio of five actions needed to enhance the role of circular bioeconomy in SSA. The results showcase the utility of integrating a circular bioeconomy approach in R4D work, especially how using such an approach can lead to significant economic, social, and environmental outcomes. The evidence presented can help inform the development of a framework to guide circular bioeconomy R4D at IITA and other research institutes working in SSA. Generating a body of evidence on what works, including the institutional factors that create enabling environments for circular bioeconomy approaches to thrive, is necessary for governments and donors to support circular bioeconomy research that will help solve some of the most pressing challenges in SSA as populations grow and generate more waste, thus exacerbating a changing climate using the linear economy model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available