4.6 Article

Indirect Economic Effects of Vertical Indoor Green in the Context of Reduced Sick Leave in Offices

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13042256

Keywords

hygrothermal comfort; indoor green; vertical greenery; indoor air quality; cost-benefit-ratio; sick leave; absenteeism; alternative quantification method

Funding

  1. TU Wien

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low indoor humidity affects respiratory disease transmission, leading to increased sick leave in offices. Vertical indoor greening improves air humidity, reduces sick leave, and results in cost savings for companies.
Low indoor humidity has been shown to influence the transmission of respiratory diseases via air. A certain proportion of sick leave in offices is therefore attributable to dryness of air. An improvement in these conditions thus means a reduction in sick leave, which is accompanied by cost savings for companies. Vertical indoor greening has a verifiable positive effect on air humidity, especially in winter months. In this article, the correlation between improved air humidity in greened rooms and reduction of sick leave due to improved air humidity was described. The resulting indirect economic effect was determined by comparing the costs for construction, green care, and technical maintenance of indoor greenery with savings due to lower sick leave. Based on long-term measurement data on air humidity and temperature, and actual cost values for three buildings, located in Vienna, Austria, with 6 greened and 3 reference rooms without greenery, the correlation of the method was derived and finally formulated in a generalized way using dimensioning factors. Only considering the influence on air humidity, profitability of 6.6 m(2) vertical greening installed in an example office with six workplaces equipped with technical ventilation and saving of two sick days already results after about 4.5 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available