4.6 Article

Joint Transformation Learning via the L2,1-Norm Metric for Robust Graph Matching

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 521-533

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2912718

Keywords

Graph matching; joint transformation; similarity metric

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [C1007-15G]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1611265, 61403164, 61572536, 11631015]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030313710, 2015A030313624]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a robust graph matching (RGM) model is proposed to improve the effectiveness and robustness in matching graphs with deformations, rotations, outliers, and noise. The RGM model embeds joint geometric transformation and utilizes $L_{2,1}$ -norm as the similarity metric for enhanced robustness. Extensive experiments demonstrate the competitive performance of the RGM model in various graph matching tasks.
Establishing correspondence between two given geometrical graph structures is an important problem in computer vision and pattern recognition. In this paper, we propose a robust graph matching (RGM) model to improve the effectiveness and robustness on the matching graphs with deformations, rotations, outliers, and noise. First, we embed the joint geometric transformation into the graph matching model, which performs unary matching over graph nodes and local structure matching over graph edges simultaneously. Then, the $L_{2,1}$ -norm is used as the similarity metric in the presented RGM to enhance the robustness. Finally, we derive an objective function which can be solved by an effective optimization algorithm, and theoretically prove the convergence of the proposed algorithm. Extensive experiments on various graph matching tasks, such as outliers, rotations, and deformations show that the proposed RGM model achieves competitive performance compared to the existing methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available