4.6 Article

DWV Infection in vitro Using Honey Bee Pupal Tissue

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.631889

Keywords

host-pathogen interaction; honey bee; deformed wing virus; viral infection; viral inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Jinji Lake Double Hundred Talents Programme
  2. XJTLU Research Development Fund [RDF-15-01-25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study established an in vitro system to investigate the mechanisms of deformed wing virus (DWV) infection, revealing the importance of the P-domain of the virion subunit VP1 and the targeting of undifferentiated cells for viral infection. Inhibitors of mammalian picornavirus 3C-protease were found to suppress RdRP synthesis, suggesting potential for screening antiviral compounds.
The deformed wing virus (DWV) has been best characterized among honey bee viruses; however, very little is known regarding the mechanisms of viral infection and replication due to the lack of immortalized honey bee cell lines. To solve this problem, we established an in vitro system using honey bee pupal tissue to reconstruct DWV binding and entry into the host cell, followed by translation of the RNA genome and polyprotein processing using RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) as a marker. Using this system, the P-domain of the virion subunit VP1 was found to be essential for DWV infection, but not for binding and entry into the cell. DWV efficiently infected the head tissue derived from early but not late pupa, suggesting that undifferentiated cells are targeted for viral infection. Furthermore, we found that inhibitors of mammalian picornavirus 3C-protease, rupintrivir and quercetin suppressed RdRP synthesis, indicating that this in vitro system is also useful for screening a compound to control viral infection. Our in vitro system may help to understand the mechanism of DWV infection in host cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available