4.4 Article

Revitalized Karuk and Yurok cultural burning to enhance California hazelnut for basketweaving in northwestern California, USA

Journal

FIRE ECOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s42408-021-00092-6

Keywords

American Indians; basketry; California; Corylus cornuta var; californica; ecosystem engineering; indigenous peoples resource use; prescribed fire; resource management

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation's (NSF) Coupled Natural and Human Systems grant [DEB-1232319]
  2. US Joint Fire Science Program [L17AC00214]
  3. NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant [1657569]
  4. NSF's Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-114747]
  5. Stanford University's Department of Anthropology
  6. Vice Provost for Graduate Education Diversity Dissertation Research Opportunity
  7. School of Humanities and Sciences Community Engagement grant
  8. USDA Forest Service
  9. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  10. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1657569] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on cultural burning among the Karuk and Yurok tribes in northwestern California reveals that high-frequency cultural burns can increase hazelnut shrub densities and enhance hazelnut basketry stem production. This not only improves gathering efficiency and reduces travel costs, but also supports the revitalization of this important cultural practice.
Background Karuk and Yurok tribes in northwestern California, USA, are revitalizing the practice of cultural burning, which is the use of prescribed burns to enhance culturally important species. These cultural burns are critical to the livelihoods of indigenous peoples, and were widespread prior to the establishment of fire exclusion policies. One of the major objectives of cultural burning is to enhance California hazelnut (Corylus cornuta Marsh var. californica) basketry stem production for Karuk and Yurok basketweavers. To evaluate cultural burning as a form of human ecosystem engineering, we monitored hazelnut basketry stem production, qualities, and shrub density in 48 plots (400 m(2)) within two prescribed and 19 cultural burn sites. Socio-ecological variables that were analyzed included burn frequency, burn season, overstory tree (>= 10 cm diameter at breast height) basal area, ungulate browse, and aspect. We also observed basketry stem gathering to compare travel distances, gathering rates, and basketweaver preferences across sites with different fire histories and land tenure. Results Hazelnut shrubs, one growing season post burn, produced a 13-fold increase in basketry stems compared with shrubs growing at least three seasons post burn (P < 0.0001). Basketry stem production and stem length displayed negative relationships with overstory tree basal area (P < 0.01) and ungulate browse (P < 0.0001). Plots burned at high frequency (at least three burn events from 1989 to 2019) had 1.86-fold greater hazelnut shrubs than plots experiencing less than three burn events (P < 0.0001), and were all located on the Yurok Reservation where land tenure of indigenous people is comparatively stronger. Basketweavers travelled 3.8-fold greater distance to reach gathering sites burned by wildfires compared with those that were culturally burned (P < 0.01). At cultural burn sites, wildfire sites, and fire-excluded sites, mean gathering rates were 4.9, 1.6, and 0.5 stems per minute per individual, respectively. Conclusions Karuk and Yurok cultural fire regimes with high burn frequencies (e.g., three to five years) promote high densities of hazelnut shrubs and increase hazelnut basketry stem production. This improves gathering efficiency and lowers travel costs to support the revitalization of a vital cultural practice. Our findings provide evidence of positive human ecosystem engineering, and show that increasing tribal sovereignty over fire management improves socio-economic well-being while at the same time supports measures of ecosystem structure and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available