4.8 Article

Constructing and optimizing 3D atlases from 2D data with application to the developing mouse brain

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.61408

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation NARSAD Young Investigator Grant
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [U01 MH122681, R01 MH109901]
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS099099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses a computational approach for 3D atlas construction that reduces artifacts by identifying anatomical boundaries in imaging data. The method was applied to the Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas, resulting in more comprehensive and accurate atlases. Performance validation on 15 whole mouse brains showed qualitative and quantitative improvement.
3D imaging data necessitate 3D reference atlases for accurate quantitative interpretation. Existing computational methods to generate 3D atlases from 2D-derived atlases result in extensive artifacts, while manual curation approaches are labor-intensive. We present a computational approach for 3D atlas construction that substantially reduces artifacts by identifying anatomical boundaries in the underlying imaging data and using these to guide 3D transformation. Anatomical boundaries also allow extension of atlases to complete edge regions. Applying these methods to the eight developmental stages in the Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas (ADMBA) led to more comprehensive and accurate atlases. We generated imaging data from 15 whole mouse brains to validate atlas performance and observed qualitative and quantitative improvement (37% greater alignment between atlas and anatomical boundaries). We provide the pipeline as the MagellanMapper software and the eight 3D reconstructed ADMBA atlases. These resources facilitate whole-organ quantitative analysis between samples and across development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available