4.2 Article

Quantitative Analysis of Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli in Retail Meat from Local Vietnamese Markets

Journal

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6678901

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [17H01687, 20H00561]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00561, 17H01687] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the abundance of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli in meat samples from local Vietnamese markets, finding that some samples were contaminated with resistant bacteria, potentially due to multiplication during sale.
The spread of drug-resistant bacteria via food has contributed to the dissemination of resistant bacteria among humans. However, the status of food contamination with resistant bacteria, particularly the quantitative level of resistant bacteria in food, has not yet been well elucidated. In this study, the abundance of colistin-resistant Escherichia coli in meat samples was quantified to understand the origin of the contamination of meat available in local Vietnamese markets. Fifteen samples each of chicken and pork meat purchased from local Vietnamese markets were assessed for the presence of colistin-resistant E. coli with the mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr. The results showed that 40% (6/15) and 66% (10/15) of the pork and chicken meat samples, respectively, were contaminated with colistin-resistant E. coli. The median quantitative levels of colistin-resistant E. coli in the contaminated pork and chicken samples were 1.8x10(4) and 4.2x10(3) CFU/g, respectively. The results of phylogenetic analysis of isolates from a chicken meat sample showed that the contaminated colistin-resistant E. coli was a mix of multiple phylogenetical clones of bacteria that may have multiplied during sale. This is the first study to quantify the abundance of colistin-resistant E. coli in meat samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available