4.5 Article

A comparison of methods for interpreting random forest models of genetic association in the presence of non-additive interactions

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Biochemical Research Methods

The revival of the Gini importance?

Stefano Nembrini et al.

BIOINFORMATICS (2018)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

PMLB: a large benchmark suite for machine learning evaluation and comparison

Randal S. Olson et al.

BIODATA MINING (2017)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Do little interactions get lost in dark random forests?

Marvin N. Wright et al.

BMC BIOINFORMATICS (2016)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Detecting gene-gene interactions using a permutation-based random forest method

Jing Li et al.

BIODATA MINING (2016)

Article Statistics & Probability

Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning With Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation

Alex Goldstein et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS (2015)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A random forest approach to capture genetic effects in the presence of population structure

Johannes Stephan et al.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2015)

Article Genetics & Heredity

A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection

Clément Niel et al.

Frontiers in Genetics (2015)

Proceedings Paper Computer Science, Information Systems

Identification of Novel Genetic Models of Glaucoma Using the EMERGENT Genetic Programming-Based Artificial Intelligence System

Jason H. Moore et al.

GENETIC PROGRAMMING THEORY AND PRACTICE XII (2015)

Editorial Material Genetics & Heredity

Why epistasis is important for tackling complex human disease genetics

Trudy F. C. Mackay et al.

GENOME MEDICINE (2014)

Article Genetics & Heredity

ViSEN: Methodology and Software for Visualization of Statistical Epistasis Networks

Ting Hu et al.

GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

An information-gain approach to detecting three-way epistatic interactions in genetic association studies

Ting Hu et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2013)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

An Exhaustive Epistatic SNP Association Analysis on Expanded Wellcome Trust Data

Christoph Lippert et al.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2013)

Review Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology

A Review for Detecting Gene-Gene Interactions Using Machine Learning Methods in Genetic Epidemiology

Ching Lee Koo et al.

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2013)

Article Genetics & Heredity

Genome-Wide Association Scan Allowing for Epistasis in Type 2 Diabetes

Jordana T. Bell et al.

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS (2011)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Random Forests for Genetic Association Studies

Benjamin A. Goldstein et al.

STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS IN GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (2011)

Review Biochemical Research Methods

Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies

Jason H. Moore et al.

BIOINFORMATICS (2010)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure

Andre Altmann et al.

BIOINFORMATICS (2010)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

A random forest approach to the detection of epistatic interactions in case-control studies

Rui Jiang et al.

BMC BIOINFORMATICS (2009)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution

Carolin Strobl et al.

BMC BIOINFORMATICS (2007)

Review Genetics & Heredity

Epistasis:: too often neglected in complex trait studies?

Ö Carlborg et al.

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2004)

Article Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence

Random forests

L Breiman

MACHINE LEARNING (2001)