4.6 Review

Naphthalimide-Based Fluorescent Polymers for Molecular Detection

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202001913

Keywords

fiber‐ optic sensor; fluorescence; fluorescent polymer; molecular probe; naphthalimide

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation [075-15-2020-792, RF-190220 x 0031]
  2. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
  3. European Social Funds research grant NitraMon, Technische Universitat Chemnitz [100339427]
  4. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intensive development of fiber-optic sensors marked the beginning of the 21st century, requiring new functional materials and specifically fluorescent probes for their design. Despite continuous development, successfully incorporating probes into functional sensing polymers remains a challenge, particularly in retaining the sensing properties of the probes in a polymer matrix.
The beginning of the 21st century was marked by the intensive development of fiber-optic sensors. New functional materials with excellent sensory properties are required to design such sensors. Fluorescent probes for neutral and charged molecules are constantly developing. However, only a small part of the reported probes was successfully converted into functional sensing polymers and found real-world applications. A great challenge is to retain the sensing properties of a probe in a polymer matrix. The purpose of this review is to understand how properties of a probe are changed upon incorporation into a polymer and to reveal successful approaches. The review focuses on the use of the naphthalimide-based probes in the construction of sensing polymers. The literature overview is presented according to the nature of the guest molecules targeted for the quantitative detection: cations, anions, and small organic molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available