4.6 Article

Optimization of the Groundwater Remediation Process Using a Coupled Genetic Algorithm-Finite Difference Method

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13030383

Keywords

groundwater flow; reactive contaminant transport; in situ chemical oxidation; finite difference method; genetic algorithm; physical sandbox experiment

Funding

  1. European Union [643087]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [327154368 (SFB 1313) - 390740016, EXC 2075/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studied the remediation of contaminated groundwater using permanganate as an oxidant through in situ chemical oxidation, and verified the model through numerical simulation, showing good agreement between numerical results, physical sandbox experiment, and analytical solution. By applying a genetic algorithm to optimize the design, the time to reach desired concentration and remediation cost can be reduced compared to arbitrary designs.
In situ chemical oxidation using permanganate as an oxidant is a remediation technique often used to treat contaminated groundwater. In this paper, groundwater flow with a full hydraulic conductivity tensor and remediation process through in situ chemical oxidation are simulated. The numerical approach was verified with a physical sandbox experiment and analytical solution for 2D advection-diffusion with a first-order decay rate constant. The numerical results were in good agreement with the results of physical sandbox model and the analytical solution. The developed model was applied to two different studies, using multi-objective genetic algorithm to optimise remediation design. In order to reach the optimised design, three objectives considering three constraints were defined. The time to reach the desired concentration and remediation cost regarding the number of required oxidant sources in the optimised design was less than any arbitrary design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available