4.7 Article

Toward a Yearly Country-Scale CORINE Land-Cover Map without Using Images: A Map Translation Approach

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13061060

Keywords

land cover; mapping; translation; nomenclature; Convolutional Neural Network; geographical encoding; CORINE Land Cover; operational

Funding

  1. AI4GEO project
  2. French National Research agency as a part of the MAESTRIA project [ANR-18-CE23-0023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on translating a national scale remote sensed map into CORINE Land Cover using a Convolution Neural Network with positional encoding. The results show that this method achieves a superior performance compared to traditional semantic-based translation approach, with an accuracy of 81% overall in France, close to the targeted 85% accuracy of CLC.
CORINE Land-Cover (CLC) and its by-products are considered as a reference baseline for land-cover mapping over Europe and subsequent applications. CLC is currently tediously produced each six years from both the visual interpretation and the automatic analysis of a large amount of remote sensing images. Observing that various European countries regularly produce in parallel their own land-cover country-scaled maps with their own specifications, we propose to directly infer CORINE Land-Cover from an existing map, therefore steadily decreasing the updating time-frame. No additional remote sensing image is required. In this paper, we focus more specifically on translating a country-scale remote sensed map, OSO (France), into CORINE Land Cover, in a supervised way. OSO and CLC not only differ in nomenclature but also in spatial resolution. We jointly harmonize both dimensions using a contextual and asymmetrical Convolution Neural Network with positional encoding. We show for various use cases that our method achieves a superior performance than the traditional semantic-based translation approach, achieving an 81% accuracy over all of France, close to the targeted 85% accuracy of CLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available