4.7 Article

Incident Angle Dependence of Sentinel-1 Texture Features for Sea Ice Classification

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13040552

Keywords

classification; sea ice; ice types; SAR; Sentinel-1; texture; GLCM; incident angle

Funding

  1. CIRFA partners
  2. Research Council of Norway [237906]
  3. UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the inclusion of Sentinel-1 texture features in a Bayesian classifier to improve the classification of sea ice types in SAR images. Results show that texture features play a crucial role in classification, especially in the generalized separation of ice and water, as well as the classification of young ice and multi-year ice, leading to significant improvements in classification accuracy.
Robust and reliable classification of sea ice types in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images is needed for various operational and environmental applications. Previous studies have investigated the class-dependent decrease in SAR backscatter intensity with incident angle (IA); others have shown the potential of textural information to improve automated image classification. In this work, we investigate the inclusion of Sentinel-1 (S1) texture features into a Bayesian classifier that accounts for linear per-class variation of its features with IA. We use the S1 extra-wide swath (EW) product in ground-range detected format at medium resolution (GRDM), and we compute seven grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features from the HH and the HV backscatter intensity in the linear and logarithmic domain. While GLCM texture features obtained in the linear domain vary significantly with IA, the features computed from the logarithmic intensity do not depend on IA or reveal only a weak, approximately linear dependency. They can therefore be directly included in the IA-sensitive classifier that assumes a linear variation. The different number of looks in the first sub-swath (EW1) of the product causes a distinct offset in texture at the sub-swath boundary between EW1 and the second sub-swath (EW2). This offset must be considered when using texture in classification; we demonstrate a manual correction for the example of GLCM contrast. Based on the Jeffries-Matusita distance between class histograms, we perform a separability analysis for 57 different GLCM parameter settings. We select a suitable combination of features for the ice classes in our data set and classify several test images using a combination of intensity and texture features. We compare the results to a classifier using only intensity. Particular improvements are achieved for the generalized separation of ice and water, as well as the classification of young ice and multi-year ice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available