4.7 Article

Stability of Proton Exchange Membranes in Phosphate Buffer for Enzymatic Fuel Cell Application: Hydration, Conductivity and Mechanical Properties

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13030475

Keywords

ionomer; blend; casting; SPEEK; SPPSU; crosslinking

Funding

  1. Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille Universite-A*MIDEX, a French Investissements d'Avenir programme [AMX-18MED-002 ENZIM-FC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proton-conducting ionomers are widely used in electrochemical energy storage devices, and their properties are influenced by operating conditions. This study examined the hydrolytic stability, conductivity, and mechanical behavior of different proton exchange membranes in phosphate buffer solution. The results indicate that membrane stability can be adjusted by altering casting solvent or procedures, and NafionTM membranes exhibit different behavior compared to SPEEK membranes.
Proton-conducting ionomers are widespread materials for application in electrochemical energy storage devices. However, their properties depend strongly on operating conditions. In bio-fuel cells with a separator membrane, the swelling behavior as well as the conductivity need to be optimized with regard to the use of buffer solutions for the stability of the enzyme catalyst. This work presents a study of the hydrolytic stability, conductivity and mechanical behavior of different proton exchange membranes based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) and sulfonated poly(phenyl sulfone) (SPPSU) ionomers in phosphate buffer solution. The results show that the membrane stability can be adapted by changing the casting solvent (DMSO, water or ethanol) and procedures, including a crosslinking heat treatment, or by blending the two ionomers. A comparison with Nafion(TM) shows the different behavior of this ionomer versus SPEEK membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available