4.7 Review

Towards the Development of Portable and In Situ Optical Devices for Detection of Micro-and Nanoplastics in Water: A Review on the Current Status

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13050730

Keywords

micro and nanoplastics; freshwater; sludge; optical detection; portable devices; in situ detection

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland Flagship Programme, Photonics Research and Innovation (PREIN) [320166]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the utilization of various optical measurement methods for screening microplastics from their natural environments, with a focus on in situ detection techniques and the development of portable optical sensors. The potential of remote sensing methods and the necessity of integrated optical solutions for continuous detection of water-based microplastics are highlighted.
The prevalent nature of micro and nanoplastics (MP/NPs) on environmental pollution and health-related issues has led to the development of various methods, usually based on Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopies, for their detection. Unfortunately, most of the developed techniques are laboratory-based with little focus on in situ detection of MPs. In this review, we aim to give an up-to-date report on the different optical measurement methods that have been exploited in the screening of MPs isolated from their natural environments, such as water. The progress and the potential of portable optical sensors for field studies of MPs are described, including remote sensing methods. We also propose other optical methods to be considered for the development of potential in situ integrated optical devices for continuous detection of MPs and NPs. Integrated optical solutions are especially necessary for the development of robust portable and in situ optical sensors for the quantitative detection and classification of water-based MPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available